Tag Archives: tackles

Ideas to improve scrums #2: North American inspiration

In a previous post looking at the future of scrums, the suggestion was to create conditions that encouraged the more imaginative football that fans want to see by initially restricting the movement of defenders so that they were less prepared to counter attacks.

The post ended: “Possession is sacred in rugby league. Is this enough encouragement to risk it?” Perhaps not.

Risk averse teams running the ball from a scrum are still likely to be content with a possession-protecting, unimaginative hit up for the first tackle because they know there are another five tackles waiting to be used. But what if there weren’t?

A first down measurement in American football

Inspiration: a down is measured © BrokenSphere / Wikimedia Commons

A rugby league take on a North American idea

This suggestion uses the straightforward threat of taking possession away if a team doesn’t get far enough on the first tackle.

In American and Canadian football, teams need to progress a necessary distance to receive another next set of downs.

A version of this could be tried in rugby league: on the first tackle from the scrum, a team could be required to advance the ball x metres to be given the full set of six tackles.

If they don’t manage it – whether it’s due to good defence or through poor play – they will be limited to two tackles in total: forfeiting four.

Only allowing the team in possession one more tackle if they don’t reach the required distance from the scrum will allow officials to rule on what will happen next straight after tackle one is completed. The referee could use calls such as “not x [metres], last tackle [next]” or “full set [of six tackles], tackle one”.

This should lead to more exciting play from the scrum as well as allowing for the possibility of creative play on the second/last tackle too.

Lacking the measuring chains used in gridiron codes, the necessary distance could be indicated using a touch judge’s flag, with match officials giving rulings just as they do with other areas of the game such as offside.

With both teams incentivised, the necessary distance set wouldn’t need to be set too far to give spectators more chance of seeing the best of attack and defence at a scrum.

Possible changes in tactics

Coaches and players will invariably look at adjusting their scrum tactics to suit the changes. They might:

  • Bind more tightly and push in the scrum, to force the opposing team’s forwards to remain there and be slower in unbinding to join the defensive line.
  • Feel less inclined to give away a differential penalty (leading to them losing ground before facing six tackles), because even if they don’t win the ball, there is an opportunity to limit their opponents to two tackles. This would mean that referees could drive up the standard of scrummaging.

 

There are also 40/20s to remember. Excepting them from this change to retain the reward for a skilful kick would be a minor issue, as they are so uncommon.

 

Worth a trial?

Whatever happened to the secret ninja finger hold?

Generations of rugby league coaches and players have worked long and hard to come up with ways to prevent the other team from making ground. Some of this creativity has been embraced, while other ideas have had a frostier reception. In the last couple of weeks, we’ve begun documenting the how, who, when and whys.

The beginnings of articles for tackles ranging from the rather tame one-leg lift through to the wince-inducing ripper tackle have been created on the wiki. There are quotes and explanations for techniques such as the grapple tackle, crusher tackle and chicken wing tackle.

And we’re still searching for information on the mysterious secret ninja finger hold move that Phil Gould mentioned in his newspaper column. If you know the ways of the finger hold, you know what to do…

Supported by: Student Accommodation Scarborough